Thursday, April 5, 2012

Assignment 3 - I'm my own publisher


I’m my own publisher 


Aldous Huxley, 1930.

 “In the days before machinery men and women who wanted to amuse themselves were compelled, in their humble way, to be artists. Now they sit still and permit professionals to entertain them by the aid of machinery. It is difficult to believe that general artistic culture can flourish in this atmosphere of passivity.” (Huxley, 1927).


New media publishing (social media publishing)
New media publishing can also be synonymous with social media publishing as the majority of online publishing covers a myriad of virtual and mobile mediums like: websites, eBooks, blogs, twitter feeds, videos, podcasts and articles on an endless sea of subjects. When googling ‘new media publishing’ the first hit is for an online publishing service called Newmedia Publishing that enables anyone to publish and distribute their written word and/or creations online. Newmedia Publishing sells their service as, “This is your site, if you are an author, content creator or publisher, which most of us are, even if we do not think of ourselves as such, in a conventional sense. Whatever you create on or with your computer today is a candidate for publication and online distribution.” (2006) Contrary to Aldous Huxley’s quote, the access to online publishing services implies that people are extremely creative, do not remain passive and now are seeking out methods to publish their creations by-passing traditional publishing houses. 

The content creator becomes their own publishing house gaining more freedom of creativity as they are not stifled by the rigidness of a publishing house. Web 2.0 has affected how publishing is carried out and has changed the rules; no longer wholly controlled by a select few. As Ianto Ware stated in 2008, “with the rise of Web 2.0 a whole range of literacies that used to be defined as “private sphere” or “everyday literacies,” everything from personal conversations and correspondence to book clubs and fanzines, have become far, far more public.” The Web has increasingly becoming a canvas where more than one user can contribute, “provid[ing] a richer tapestry for the next user to modify or build on.” (Tapscott & Williams, 2006, p 27) 

Johannes Gutenberg's printing press
As history indicates change occurs with the introduction of publication technologies first with Johannes Gutenberg’s printing press in the 1400s, the household printer and now with online publishing technologies like eBooks, blogs, videos and podcasts. Ware continues to mention that the idea of a ‘traditional publishing house’ continuing to remain fixed is naive. 

“What the rise of Web 2.0 has done is simply to bring every day, private sphere dialogue driven literacies into the public sphere in a very obvious way. The kind of discourses once passed off as resistant youth subcultures are now being shown as common place. Keen is right to suggest that this will continue to impact, sometimes negatively, on traditional gatekeepers. Yet the change is inevitable. As our reading and writing practices alter around new genres, our understandings of what constitutes legitimate fields of publishing will also change.” (Ware, 2008, paragraph 20)
In addition to the online changes occurring with publishing services; the advancement and increased access to ‘modern’ technology also increases the creative freedom for the everyday Joe and Jane to publish their contributions. Virtual and mobile technology has provided the tools for more creativity and wider distribution.

MarshallMcLuhan favored the technological humanism perspective  because it sought, “to renew technique from within by releasing the creative possibilities inherent in the technological experience ... [and] will create the conditions for a new ... condition.” (Kroker, 1945, p 14) This ‘new condition’ implies that more individuals will interact on the virtual stage contributing to a cultural shift in how society views publishing. This shift in how society views publishing is creating new literacy practices amongst writers, content creators and artists. 

Some view this shift as a revolution like Andrew Keen who is renowned for his disapproval of removing the ‘gatekeepers’ (publishers and certifiable experts) enabling the non-professional to contribute. “[Keen’s] His definition of “publishing” is essentially one in which a few, carefully groomed producers express work seen as relevant to the wider community.” (Ware, 2008, paragraph 4) 

Blogging
Men and women are not just idly sitting still (well they are probably sitting) but they are not inactive, “permit[ting] professionals to entertain them by the aid of machinery.” (Huxley, 1927) They are utilizing the machinery to create their own messages a good example would be blog writers or bloggers who are creating a genre of online journal writing. They are millions of blogs on a myriad of subjects ranging from political, academic, artistic and social commentary to mention a few blog genres. One that blog that made a big splash in the blogging world and eventually crossed the threshold to become a published book and a wide release movie was the Julie/Julia Project blog written by Julie Powell . Unfortunately the original blog is no longer available due to the blog service updating their programming. The Julie/Julia Project blog is a good example of an online publication creating a network and community for interested readers. 

Stine Gotved's Triangle of Cybersocial Reality
Reviewed through Stine Gotved’s The Triangle of Cybersocial Reality the Julie/Julia Project blog is an example of an interactive online network. The basic Triangle Approach (the inner triangle) includes three basic sociological categories of culture, structure and interaction framing the cybersocial reality created by integrating technology and social networking. “The triangle symbolizes the condition for the construction of social reality ... eyes are drawn to the center of the triangle, where all the different factors and categories convene and where the cyber social reality is constructed.” (Gotved, 2006, p 170) The culture side would include the common understanding of Powell’s blog as a study of Julia Child’s cookbook, Mastering ofthe Art of French Cooking. Julia Child is a well known chef who had a huge impact on the American creating recipes that brought French cuisine to average American family. 

“On the triangle’s structural side, the organization is in focus....where the social structure and organization are intertwined tightly with the technology’s interface and underlying design ideology.” (Gotved, 2006, p 171) The structure of a blog involves the blogger writing posts that are published via blog server like Blogger these blog posts are then read by the reader who may or may not write a comment. Interaction occurs when the reader responds to a blogger’s post, “interaction occurs not only between humans but also between humans and computers and between computers.” (Gotved, 2006, p 171)  The online social complexities covered in the basic triangle include: surfers, networks communities and the dyad indicated with the triangle. 

The online community established with the Julie/Julia Project blog illustrates the interaction between writer and reader but also illustrates that people are doing more than just being entertained. They are actively participating from their computers with a variety of contributors creating online communities. Social media publishing is allowing everyone, with the technology to have access to becoming published authors or creators.

Resources
(2004 – 2012). [image]. Gutenberg’s Printing Press, Clipart ETC, Florida Center for Instructional Technology. Retrieved from http://etc.usf.edu/clipart/44800/44880/44880_guten_press.htm

(2006). About Us. Newmedia Publishing. Retrieved from: http://newmediapublishing.com/

(2010, September 3). [image]. Mentoliptus: Show GRUB2 Menu Only If Shift Key Is Pressed in Multi-Boot System. Retrieved from http://mentoliptus.blogspot.ca/2010/09/show-grub2-menu-only-if-shift-key-is.html

Agnihotri, S. (2010, August 10). [image]. Gotved’s Triangle. Digital Tribes: Superfan 2.0. Retrieved from http://sunilagni.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/digital-tribes/

Flood, A. (2011, April 12). [image]. Brave New World among top 10 books Americans most want banned. The Guardian, UK edition. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/apr/12/brave-new-world-challenged-books
Gotved, S. (2006). The Construction of Cybersocial Reality. Silver, D & Massanari, A. (Eds.). Critical Cyberculture Studies. (pp 168-178). New York: NYU Press. 
Huxley, A. (1927, August) The Outlook for American Culture: Some Reflections in a Machine Age, Harper’s Magazine. 

Kroker, A. (1945). The Canadian Discourse (pp 7- 19). Technology and The Canadian Mind. Montreal: New World Perspectives.

Tapscott,D., & Williams, A. (2006). The Perfect Storm. In Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (pp. 34-64): Portfolio.

Ware, Ianto. (2008). “Andrew Keen Vs the Emos: Youth, Publishing, and Transliteracy.”

NMN Assignment 3: The Evolution of Publishing

The next step in the evolution of publishing begins with the toolsJ.K. Rowling sit in a cafe where she penned the first Harry Potter novelThe first publishers of Harry Potter: Bloomsbury Publishing's UK OfficeBoxes of the new Harry Potter novels from the printersHarry Potter fans fill a bookstore as they rush to buy the next novelHarry Potter fans remix the copyrighted material to create original works
MuggleNet, a Harry Potter fansite, helps fans share stories in their fan fiction sectionHeather Lawver creator of Harry Potter fansite, The Daily Prophet, organized a boycott against Warner Bros.Fan fiction writers collaborate to improve their work and help each otherWarner Brothers' version of The Daily Prophet on display at their Wizarding World theme parkLawver's Daily Prophet site shares its title with the newspaper in Harry PotterFans scramble to get their hands on the newest novel
Remixed fan art posted on MuggleNetWarner Bros. current Harry Potter WebsitePottermore is designed to "give back" to fansPottermore's "Terms and Conditions" for User Generated ContentFansite the Leaky Cauldron features remixed artJ. K. Rowling official passes the writing and publishing torch to future authors
J. K. Rowling's planning sheet for Harry Potter and the Order of the PhoenixThe availability of publishing tools is forcing the publishing world to evolve

Traditional publishing methods are costly and force publishers to critically evaluate each submission to see if it is worth printing in hopes of earning a profit (Shirky, 2008, p. 97). This has lead to many excellent novels being rejected, including J.K. Rowling’s original Harry Potter, which was denied by eight publishers before being accepted by Bloomsbury UK (Lawless, 2005). These publishers missed the opportunity to get a share of the best-selling series in recent history and one that helped make its author a billionaire (Watson, 2004).

After reading the Harry Potter novels, fans were inspired to create their own works remixing aspects of Rowling’s fictional universe. Unable to wait for the next novel, fans began writing their own versions of the tales and published them on fansites such as MuggleNet. Other fans would read the stories and comment or offer suggestions for improvement which improves the story by building on more than just one author’s expertise (MuggleNet, n.d.). Apart from adhering to basic fansite guidelines about sexuality, violence and profanity, no submission is rejected due to the poor marketability (MuggleNet, n.d.). This is a stark contrast from the traditional publishing model and it prevents gems such as Rowling’s original work from being overlooked.

However, the world of remix culture is not always filled with fans and supporters. When Warner Bros. learned that fans sites were using their copyrighted material without permission, their lawyers sent threatening letters to everyone involved, including children posting on the sites (Lessig, 2008, p. 209). The fans, including Heather Lawver, creator of The Daily Prophet fansite, was shocked that Warner Bros. was attacking its own fans and enlisted the help of the fan community to boycott their products (Lessig, 2008, p. 207).

The backlash caused Warner Bros. to review the way they interacted with this passionate community of fans (Lessig, 2008, p. 209). They decided to allow the fansites to continue because the fans were not profiting off Warner Bro’s material (Lessig, 2008, p. 209). Warner Bros. may not have realized that the fansites were actually helping to build the Harry Potter brand without any cost to the company.

Twelve years later, J. K. Rowling, Warner Bros., Bloomsbury and other copyright owners have joined together to create a free, collaborative area for Harry Potter fans, called Pottermore (Rowling, n.d.). This new site opens to the public later this month and will feature previously unreleased content (Rowling, n.d.).  The site will also be used to advertise and distribute Harry Potter ebooks (Rowling, n.d.). Pottermore was not available in 2000 when the original lawsuits threatened fan sites, but could have eliminated the need for them.

The remixed culture not only help to publish more work faster, it helped encourage Warner Bros. to interact with its fans better and to produce online collaborative work spaces. Rowling used traditional publishing to producer her novels, but her fans can publish themselves. When they remix the stories and publish them, fans are not only writing the next chapter in the Harry Potter saga, they are writing the next chapter in the evolution of publishing.

Access Flickr photos here

References  


123RF.com (n.d). 10105609-global-computer-network-illustration-design.jpg. Retrieved April 3 from http://us.cdn3.123rf.com/168nwm/alexmillos/alexmillos1108/alexmillos110800028/10105609-global-computer-network-illustration-design.jpg

Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. (n.d.) Google maps: Street view of 50 Bedford Square. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://maps.google.ca/

Darr Beiser, H. (2001, February 22). ‘Potter’ web fans organize boycott. USA Today. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-02-22-potter.htm

Flood, A. (2012, March 27). Pottermore conjures Harry Potter ebooks [Electronic version].
The Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/27/pottermore-harry-potter-ebooks

Jo, K. (2007). Stacked books. NowPublic Photo Archives. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://www.nowpublic.com/stacked_books

Jordison, S. (2011, June 23). Pottermore gives away JK Rowling's marketing genius [Electronic version]. The Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2011/jun/23/pottermore-jk-rowling-marketing-genius-harry-potter

Human Capital Magazine. (2011). Social network recruitment proves better in the long-run [Electronic version]. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://www.hcamag.com/site-search/social-network-recruitment-proves-better-in-the-long-run/83495/?keyword=social+media

Lawless, J. (2005) Nigel Newton. Bloomberg Businessweek [Electronic version]. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_22/b3935414.htm

Lessig, L. (2008).
Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

Lezard, N. (2011, June 23). Pottermore: JK Rowling’s reading 2.0 [Electronic version].
The Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/23/pottermore-jk-rowling

Marsh, B. (2001).
Currents in electronic literacy. Retrieved April 2, 2012 from http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/currents/fall01/marsh/marsh.html

MuggleNet. (n.d.) MuggleNet.com. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://www.mugglenet.com/

MuggleNet. (n.d.) MuggleNet Fan Fiction. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from http://fanfiction.mugglenet.com/viewpage.php?page=rules

MuggleNet. (n.d.) Potter art. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from
http://s3.mugglenet.com/images/normal_Rosie-Hogwarts.jpg

Rowling, J.K. (n.d.) Peek inside J.K.Rowling’s writing process - in pen.The Teacher Geek. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from http://theteachergeek.com/2011/01/peek-inside-j-k-rowlings-writing-process-in-pen/

Rowling, J.K. (2012). Pottermore.com. Retrieved April 3 from http://www.pottermore.com/

Rowling, J.K. (2012). Pottermore.com terms and conditions. Retrieved April 3 from

http://www.pottermore.com/en/terms#about-content

Sandberg, J. (2011, July 6). Wild about Harry.
Washington Post. Retrieved April 2, 2012 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/kidspost/wild-about-harry/2011/07/06/gIQANhbf3H_gallery.html#photo=5

Sheppard, Z. (2010). Harry Potter people waiting for book 7 by Zack Sheppard. A Novelist’s Mind: Lilian Nattel Online. Retrieved April 3, 2010 from
http://liliannattel.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/harry-potter-people-waiting-for-book-7-by-zack-sheppard-sf.jpg

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

Silver, K. (2012, March 11).
What does famous author JK Rowling reveal about being gobsmackingly wealthy. The Lotto Life. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from http://thelottolife.com/blog/2012/3/11/what-does-famous-author-jk-rowling-reveal-about-being-gobsma.html

Stan, R. (2012). Harry Potter studio tour: Daily prophet. Retrieved April 3, 2012 from

http://www.flickr.com/photos/revstan/7012118665/

Universal Orlando. (2012). The Wizarding World of Harry Potter. Retrieved April 2, 2012 from
http://www.universalorlando.com/harrypotter/

Watson, J. (2004, February 26). J.K. Rowling and the billion-dollar empire [Electronic version]. Forbes. Retrieved April 5, 2012 from http://www.forbes.com/2004/02/26/cx_jw_0226rowlingbill04.html

Williams, C. (2011).
Everything I know about ITSM I learned from Darwin - part II: Evolutionary man. BMC Communities. Retrieved April 4, 2012 from
https://communities.bmc.com/communities/community/bsm_initiatives/itsm/blog/tags/itil